Відео

"There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle."- Albert Einstein. Explore the miracle of consciousness by singing *HU* daily. Search how to sing *HU* as a spiritual or scientific tuning fork to safely alter personal frequencies? Keep It Simple Soul. "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration."- Nikola Tesla. Bypass intellectual speculations. Go practical. Do it. live It.

Simple fun easy Experiment to safely explore personal consciousness: Sing *HU* daily. Search how to sing *HU* as a spiritual tuning fork to alter personal frequencies. "If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibrations."- Nikola Tesla. Keep It Simple Soul. Bypass intellectual speculations; onerous theories; deep discussions that seemingly spin top in mud? Go practical. Do it.

Simple experiment to safely explore personal consciousness: Sing *HU* daily. Search how to sing *HU* . Bypass intellectual acrobatics; unwieldy terminology; debates; long and fruitful discussions, etc., and have your own experiences? 😀🤍

You put your techers equations on blackboard and want to make us believe you are smart ?

The "wave function" is a mathematical device, invented by we "homo sapiens" (I suggest we revise that to the less self-congratulatory and more technically accurate linguistic indicator and index "homo carta") to linguistically encode and share with our fellow species members our sensory-observationally derived 'on-board maps' (a.k.a. "concepts") of what I propose is in fact the pure self-relative motion (a.k.a. "acceleration"; a.k.a. "energy"; a.k.a. "push" -- i.e. what you "feel") of what is otherwise an absolutely continuous and scale-uniform hyper-fluid medium (SUM), which Einstein indirectly identified as "spacetime", and whose overall and most elementary geometry of 'acceleration-flow' is that of a frictionlessly 'self-siphoning' (if you will) horn toroidal fluid vortex (HTV), a.k.a. a "black hole". … Over "time", this 'self-sustaining' geometry has recursively 'self-fractalized' into the architecture of a distributed network of 'particulate' I/O 'devices' that we "see" as particulate mass objects (PMO's). 'Shaped space shapes space' (if you will). "Consciousness" is a feedback loop - and more specifically, a self-organizing (a.k.a. self-configuring; a.k.a. self-constructing) feedback circuit comprised by this network, and mediated by "electromagnetic radiation" (a.k.a. "light") propagating at/as an asymptotic velocity limit of accelerated motion amongst these PMOs. The self-relative "direction" of SUM flow not taken into account as such by our current "standard model" of physics is the point-radial (which we can self-consistently [with our current terminology] describe as the 4th spacetime) "dimension". Take that into account, and the rest falls into place (see what you can do with it). Why are the "universal constants" what they are? Because that's what works. ... 'The more tools I have, the more tools I can build. I build with what I have already built. I am the _process_ of building myself' (again, if you will). Welcome to 'The Graviton'.

Great talk

The trouble with a lecture like this is that he knows these concepts "in his mind's eye" but a person listening to this cannot understand just words with no frame of reference.

Can someone please help me understand this better ? i have a question to ask. From what i've understood, bacterias evolving to the citrate positive point was a very low probability and it happened thanks to an accumulative process. My question is; how every little mutation change step can somehow serve the end result which is becoming citrate positive ?

the moment it was stated that what was of importance was diversity and that there were too many white guys, it became obvious nothing of value would come of this talk.

❤

Thank you

Tim should get a Nobel Prize for playing nice, among other things. Did the guy on the right really say he has been thinking about what it would be like to “stop time for 10,000 years”? How does he think he is going to measure a length of time (regardless of magnitude) if time is stopped? These multi-disciplinary panels have very little value in my opinion, at least in part because the disciplines use the same words to mean different things so that the panelists talk past each other. The difference between the conscious and the subconscious may be very meaningful for neurologists, but meaningless from the perspective of physics. Whether someone’s body responds to a stimulus “consciously” or due to the involuntary nervous system has no bearing on the physics question.

Яркий пример того, как отсутствие какой-либо физической идеи приводит к бессмысленному жонглированию математическими формулами и понятиями. 🧐🙉

Time is a degree of freedom wherein change happens and as such it is akin to a road wherein cars are able to move in either direction, the only restriction keeping cars moving in a singular direction would be a city ordinance which allows the cars to move in a specific direction and not the other!! That ordinance is the arrow of entropy or the statistical truth of disordered states being more numerous than ordered states!! The arrow of time is actually the arrow of entropy and not time per se!! - Jaime Tan

I AGREE WITH ROGER PENROSE! NOT YOU! TAKE THAT!

ME TOO. IT BEAT'S THIS BANAL RIF RAF.❤

Here are 4 more examples showcasing how non-contradictory infinitesimal/monadological frameworks can resolve paradoxes across various scientific domains: 17) Thermodynamics and Foundations of Statistical Mechanics Contradictory Paradoxes: - Gibbs Paradox about distinguishability of particles - Maxwell's Demon paradox regarding information/entropy - Loschmidt's Paradox about time-reversal asymmetry Non-Contradictory Possibilities: Infinitesimal Ergodic Realizations S = -kB Σi pi ln(pi) (entropy from realization weights) pi = Ni/N (weights from monadic distinctions) N = Πj mj^nj (total realization monadology) Representing entropy as a measure over distinct infinitesimal monadic realizations subjectivized via the pi probability weights could resolve classical paradoxes while reconciling information and time's arrow. 18) Foundations of Logic Contradictory Paradoxes: - Russell's Paradox about sets/classes - Liar's Paradox about self-reference - Berry's Paradox about definability Non-Contradictory Possibilities: Pluriverse-Valued Realizability Logics ⌈A⌉ = {Ui(A) | i ∈ N} (truth values over monadic realizations) A ↔ B ⇐⇒ ⌈A⌉ = ⌈B⌉ (pluriverse-valued equivalence) Representing propositions as pluriverses of realizable monadic interpretations Ui(A), rather than binary truth values, could avoid diagonalization, circularity and definability paradoxes. 19) Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Contradictory Paradoxes: - Measurement Problem - Schrodinger's Cat paradox - Einstein's "Spooky Action at a Distance" paradox Non-Contradictory Possibilities: Monadic Relational QM |Ψ> = Σn cn Un(A)|0> (superposition of monadic perspectives) Un(A) = ΠiΓn,i(Ai) (integrated monad of relational properties) Representing quantum states as superposed monadic perspectives Un integrated over the relational algebraic properties Γn,i(Ai) could resolve paradoxes by grounding phenomena in coherent relational pluralisms. 20) The Unification of Physics Contradictory Barriers: - Clash between quantum/relativistic geometric premises - Infinities and non-renormalizability issues - Lack of quantum theory of gravity and spacetime microphysics Non-Contradictory Possibilities: Algebraic Quantum Gravity Rμν = k [ Tμν - (1/2)gμνT ] (monadic-valued sources) Tμν = Σab Γab,μν (relational algebras) Γab,μν = f(ma, ra, qa, ...) (catalytic charged mnds) Treating gravity/spacetime as collective phenomena emerging from catalytic combinatorial charge relation algebras Γab,μν between pluralistic relativistic monadic elements could unite QM/QFT/GR description. The key theme is using infinitesimal relational monadological frameworks to represent phenomena that appear paradoxical under classical separability assumptions as perfectly coherent manifestations of integrated pluralistic structures. Whether statistical mechanics, logic, QM or unified physics - the contradictions all stem from erroneous premises that: 1) Observers are separable from observations 2) Properties/events are independently existing entities 3) Time evolution is fundamentally deterministic 4) Reality can be fully represented in a single mathematical model By centering infinitesimal monadic perspectival interactions as primitives, these paradox-generating premises are all circumvented in favor of irreducible relational pluralisms. The monadic "zero" subjects and their combinatorial algebras become the SOURCE of coherent interdependent plurality, not a paradoxical separable ontic realm. Deterministic laws emerge as statistically regulated boundary patterns on a vaster potential pluriverse. In essence, the monadological frameworks realign our descriptive representations with the inescapable facts of first-person experience - allowing our physics and logics to resonate with the intrinsic integrated structure of reality we comprise, rather than segregating it into hopeless contradictions. This pluralistic Renaissance offers the path toward renovating humanity's knowledge bases and reason architectures - restoring consilience by deriving all phenomena as cohesive relational aspects of a monadic metaphysics, rooted in irreducible first-person facts.

This is so amazing. Schrodinger's Cat was a criticism of quantum mechanics. The Big Bang was a criticism of a ex nihilo universe. Maxwell's Demon was a criticism of knowledge of statistical systems. All of these former criticisms have become part of whatever they were criticizing. They were assimilated. Amazing. I love it.

How does anyone in a professional forum, makes statements with no data/evidence/facts!? Notice inm whole discussion no data or biological facts/data are ever mentioned. "Nice work if you can get it." ONE person on the panel was trained in biology - and he started as an engineer!

Is it possible to turn 'wood' into 'marble' by shifting Stress-energy tensor to the left side of EFE? Thereby leaving 2 d.o.f. - angles and making EFE simpler.

Time is that which the clocks show. We try to teach this to the five year olds... but very few are paying attention. :-)

It's not the job of physicists to explain why economics is such a clown-show. Stop asking them about it. Start asking economists.

Slippery slope to superdeterminism? What´s wrong about superdeterminism? Is it a swearword in mainstream QM already?

Many years later she made a video about this topic, interesting. She´s an intersting personality, and a remarkable scientist.

How can measurement be entropy increasing? For after measurement, you know for certain what has happened, and increasing certainty is decreases entropy, right?

The two questions you have: 1. How can a closed system equilibrate? 2. How can unitary Evolution increase entropy? 1. If the mathematics of Quantum Mechanics represents the physics of time with a probabilistic uncertain ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π future coming into existence with the exchange of photon ∆E=hf energy, because it is just the exchange of energy we can have the potential for equilibrium within a closed system. 2. The absorption and emission of light waves continuously forming photon energy, or unit of unitary action, transforming potential energy PE into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of electrons or matter will form statistical entropy naturally increase the potential for equilibrium.

There was FQXi Conference in 2023. Why did no one tell me

Is the replicator on Star Trek a universal constructor? 🤔🖖

8:50 what it would mean if a universal constructor wasn’t possible 16:50 you’ll make money in a post constructor society by creating and encoding knowledge/transformations that people want 19:45 the smallest possible universal constructor aka the protomolecule from expanse 21:00 leaving the traditional funding path and sustaining his own research

"New shit has come to light." - The Dude

Interesting, and nice introduction by Dr. Zeeya. Whould like to know if what DD. says about funding of basic research is related to the UK or he considers that as a global problem. In her book 'Lost in Math', Sabine Hossenfelder mentioned similar problems.

Thanks.

He is a hateful racist and a fanatic of the Israeli occupation that builds illegal settlements

Amazing!

But Max Tedmark mathematics is an experience in consciousness, you have to be conscious to experience mathematics, mathematics is experienced in the mind.

For the 99% of us (you're welcome): In simpler terms, when Sean Carroll talks about getting "gravity for free," he's exploring a fascinating idea: that the force of gravity, as we know it, might naturally emerge from the basic principles of quantum mechanics, without having to start from Einstein's famous equations that describe how gravity works. Here's a way to think about it using an analogy: Imagine you're at a party where everyone is holding hands, forming a large network. This network of hand-holding friends represents the "entanglement" in quantum mechanics, a kind of invisible thread that connects particles across distances, making them behave in sync no matter how far apart they are. Now, let's say the way people are positioned and connected at this party determines the layout of the room, much like how entanglement patterns might give rise to the structure of space itself. If everyone spreads out evenly, the room feels flat. But if a group huddles closely together, they create a "dent" in the layout, much like a star or planet would curve the space around it due to its mass, according to Einstein's theory of gravity. Carroll suggests that the "dents" and "hills" in this party layout-akin to the curves in space that we interpret as gravity-can naturally result from the way these quantum connections (entanglements) are arranged. So, just by understanding these quantum hand-holding patterns, we might explain why objects fall to the ground or why planets orbit stars, without needing to directly use Einstein's equations of gravity. The implications are profound: It means that gravity, one of the universe's fundamental forces, could be a byproduct of the quantum world's properties. Just like the atmosphere you feel at a party emerges from the interactions and connections among the guests, the force of gravity might emerge from the underlying quantum "social network" of particles in the universe. In essence, Carroll is suggesting that if we look closely at the quantum mechanics level-how particles are entangled and form the fabric of space-we might find that gravity naturally arises from these interactions, giving us a deeper understanding of the universe without needing to start from classical physics' assumptions.

The day a large language model can "understand" this talk and perform all of the mathematics required to analyze it and come up with testable theories of its own will be an amazing accelerant to the truth.

Interesting conceptual title art.

Space has an ambient sound track

Your voice is the same as smallant1

Science fiction.

I posted my UA-cam video "Neurodeterminism, Free Will, Free When and Time" before seeing Ian Durham's videos. ua-cam.com/video/lb7BOVo_xOo/v-deo.html

I posted my UA-cam video "Neurodeterminism, Free Will, Free When and Time" before seeing Ian Durham's videos. ua-cam.com/video/lb7BOVo_xOo/v-deo.html

I think this is a confused talk.

It was startling and heartwarming to hear the great ovation that the audience gave Sir Roger the moment his image appeared. And that is because of not only his extraordinary mind and his ability to explain complex themes, but also his humility and pleasant demeanor. The man doesn't have one gram of pretentiousness about him. He is a unique treasure in this otherwise drab and so fake world we have right now.

Good morning & Evening friends LORD JESUS CHRIST LOVES YOU ALL 🙏✝️🙏

For the truth, read the holy Bible

Time like interference pattern? Wow, could it shed light on what happens in a measurement? Superdeterminism?

Interesting. Enjoyed it! Thanks.

Hi Dr. Zia, these podcasts are a pleasrue, thank you. You mentioned a link to the visualisation of the spherical pentagons of the Dublin group? Couldn´t find it. And a little notice, the BigBang wasn´t an expolosion, that might confuse some people. Happy new year.